Analyse : ‘Démocratie environnementale’ – la différence entre la législation et la pratique

DISCLAIMER: All opinions in this column reflect the views of the author(s), not of Euractiv Media network.

L’Initiative d’accès (Access Initiative), une coalition mondiale de groupes d’intérêt public, a publié un rapport sur les niveaux comparatifs de la ‘démocratie environnementale’ parmi plusieurs pays d’Europe centrale et orientale. 

The report focuses on national-level implementation of commitments to access of information, participation, and justice in environmental decision-making. Thus, it examines whether significant gaps exist between in-place legislation and subsequent on-the-ground implementation. The performances of Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal and Ukraine form the basis of the study. 

The paper comes to the following conclusions regarding the above-mentioned countries:

  • Legal frameworks support the meaningful implementation of access rights;
  • access to information is generally satisfactory;
  • public participation in decision-making exists, but does not guarantee that it is acted upon;
  • access to justice is gradually opening up for environmental matters, and;
  • large gaps between commitment and practice exist in areas heavily dependent on financial and human resources.

Read the full report here:

Inscrivez-vous à notre newsletter

S'inscrire